Caregivers Trials and Tribulations

The New York Times recently reported that caregiving is set to become the number one profession in the USA by the year 2020, overtaking retail.

This tells us there are a tremendous number of people caring for an individual needing long-term-care (LTC) services.  Whether they are working as a professional caregiver, or are caring for a family member, the stress is similar.  Today I am referring to an April 1 article in the USA Today newspaper concerning the depression that comes from doing this work.

The article mentions that 64% of those caring for disabled veterans have jobs.  On average, they miss about a day of work each week.  Twenty-eight percent quit work due to their caregiving duties.  Sixty percent say they are under constant financial strain.  Many of these caregivers are aging themselves and worry what will happen to the loved ones they care for when they can no longer provide that care.

It has also been documented that the morbidity (health) of caregivers is significantly worse for their entire life, even after their caregiving duties are over.  This is not something you want to burden your family with if it is avoidable.  However, with many states requiring more significant disability to qualify for Medicaid payments for care, many families will be required to step into a caregiving role, whether they have the time, energy, or space to do so or not.

Those who take responsibility for their own care will be able to choose the providers they want, and pay for it.  When I first purchased my LTC insurance policy 13 years ago, I thought it was expensive.  However, over the years that premium has become a smaller and smaller percentage of my income, just like a mortgage payment does.  The benefits though, at a built in 5% compound inflation factor, have kept up with the costs of services I may someday need.   Fortunately, I purchased my insurance at age 52, before several medical conditions became evident that would have made such insurance impossible to get, at any cost.

I know that I can obtain and pay for any LTC that I might need.  Do you have a plan?  Social Security will not be sufficient to pay for care, and with facility care costing between $40,000 and $100,000 a year, most life savings accounts will be emptied very quickly.  This is something that needs to be considered while you are still healthy.  More information is available at www.TheLongTermCareGuy.com

Qualifying To Purchase LTC Insurance Is Becoming Much More Difficult

 

 

Years ago the Long Term Care (LTC) insurance industry went through an education process which some say is continuing today.  The industry learned that blood pressure and cholesterol led to death, not disablement, and thus insurers are not too concerned about those conditions.  Cancer was not seen as a concern since once you needed assistance with day to day activities, your lifespan was likely short and you may not require substantial long term care.

Over time it was learned that diabetes leads not only to loss of limbs and blindness, but also to Alzheimer’s Disease.  It has also been learned that if one family member has Alzheimer’s Disease, other family members are at significantly higher risk.  Life expectancy continues to increase and the longer one lives, the more likely some care will be necessary.

Years ago many people could purchase LTC insurance in their 70’s.  Today, few of us can qualify health-wise to purchase a policy at that age.  A troubling knee, arthritis, a poor showing on a bone density test, blood sugar readings too high, the use of blood thinners like Warfarin, all can preclude us from purchasing such coverage today.

Many pundits still suggest it is silly to purchase LTC insurance before 65, but if you wait until that age many of us will find we are no longer eligible to purchase coverage.  40% of the people requiring LTC today are between 18 and 64 years of age.  The Health and Human Services Department of our federal government claims that 70% of us will need LTC.  www.LongTermCare.gov

Blood thinners like Warfarin are taken to prevent blood clots which lead to strokes.  If you are at risk, you may not be able to purchase LTC insurance.  Arthritis medications such as steroids almost always preclude obtaining coverage.   Severely underweight or overweight applicants are also declined.

Basically, if you wish to purchase LTC insurance, you need to do so before health conditions that might someday lead to care are diagnosed.  It is very much like car insurance, you must buy it before the accident, not after.  If you decide to wait until you are 60 or 65 and find you are still in excellent health (using a walker or having diabetes is NOT excellent health) then you are lucky and can still purchase coverage.  However, you may be well advised to consider it while in your 40’s or early 50’s, before chronic conditions become known.

I am often asked at what age should someone consider LTC insurance.  It is not so much your age, but your financial situation that determines when is appropriate.  If you are healthy, and have savings and income that you want to keep for retirement, then it might be time to investigate.  If you decide the cost is more than you can afford right now, then purchase it later, at least you have an ide what you are dealing with.  More information is available at www.TheLongTermCareGuy.com

 

Is Something Really Better Than Nothing?

Recently, I have had a few conversations with agents about clients who have purchased the life/long term care products.  Now, it’s no secret that I am skeptical about the benefit of these products for clients (which I’ll explain later). When I share my concerns with the agents, I invariably get the response, “Well, something is better than nothing.”  Is it?

Long term care insurance (LTCI) is a complicated product because many factors need to be taken into account when selecting the appropriate product for the client.  The major questions include how much benefit is appropriate, for how long, the nature of the deductible – commonly called the elimination period, and inflation.

The first factor–how much benefit is appropriate–can be determined by considering how much of the cost of care clients can cover with their own resources—how much they can pay “out of pocket”.  When care is needed, the lifestyle changes that occur at the same time often mean that other areas of spending go down.  For example, they may be able to sell a car that is no longer being driven, will probably travel less, go out for dinner less frequently, and generally be out and about less.  Those dollars that were formerly used for these things can now be reallocated to paying part of the cost of care.  The interest generated on a life savings can also help pay for care, even while preserving the principal.

Selecting the proper product becomes essential in accomplishing what is intended here. If the combination of the clients’ income sources, along with the proposed LTC insurance benefit is not enough to pay the monthly bills for care when that care is needed, the clients’ assets will be depleted.  Eventually, they will become impoverished and need to turn to Medicaid.

Choosing the length of the benefit and the deductible is often a matter of what companies offer and what the clients prefer. Many companies have been shortening the length of time they will provide a benefit. Here too, clients may need to decide how much they can pay for on their own before they would need to turn to the insurance when considering these benefit levels.

One of the most vital items that must  be considered  when selecting an appropriate LTCI product is the impact of inflation on the benefits, especially when the needed care might not start for 20, 30, or 40 years from the time of purchase .  The costs of long term care services (such as assisted living, nursing care, home care, and so on) have been increasing by an average of 5- 6% per year for the past 20 years.   Since about 2008, the impact of the recession has resulted in a slightly lower rate of inflation, but costs will likely accelerate in the future.  The New York Times recently reported that “Caregiving” will become the largest profession in the United States by 2020, overtaking retail.  This is because of some basic demographic changes that are occurring.

My other blog posts have discussed the impact of the aging of the baby boomer population on the demand for long term care services.  Suffice it to say that the unprecedented number of people on the cusp of turning 65—or older—will have an impact on long term care service needs, just as it has impacted every other institution over the past 60 years. Especially significant is the fact that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says that at some point, 70% of Americans will need some long term care services.  There are fewer working-age caregivers, compared to the growing number of seniors who will need care.  The market always responds to an imbalance of demand and supply– wages will rise to attract more workers to meet the need.  All this is a recipe for rapidly increasing costs of long term care services.  A benefit that will pay for long term care today will be as useless as having  $1 to fill a gallon gasoline can 20, 30, or 40 years from now.  Thus, purchasing long term care insurance without an automatic 5% inflation factor benefit increase is not in the consumer’s best interest.

So…is something better than nothing?  Is a flat spare tire better than nothing?  You think you are covered in the event of a flat tire, but you have actually lost fuel mileage hauling around that empty flat spare while thinking you had “insurance” against a flat.

Similarly, if you paid LTCI premiums for many years, and then find that the cash flow it provides, along with your other available income sources is not enough to pay for care, you have no choice but to spend assets down to impoverishment and end up on Medicaid.  What good did that policy and all those years of premiums do for you?  They helped you go broke faster, and you still end up on the welfare program called Medicaid.

Long term care insurance is a complicated product.  Decisions made when purchasing it today will affect you many years down the road.  If it does not do what it was expected to do, it was a waste of time and money for clients and provides them a false sense of security.

My aforementioned skepticism about the life/long term care products is that when they were introduced, they didn’t include the inflation feature… and you can see that I think this is essential to protect clients.  The good news is that many products have now begun to include this.  Agents who have clients who can benefit from a life/long term care product have an obligation to seek out the ones that include inflation protection, for the protection of their client.

From time to time, I have even heard some agents say that clients won’t buy the life/long term care policy with inflation because it’s too expensive, so that’s why they sell the ones without inflation. That makes me wonder—is this about making a sale or doing what’s best for clients?

So..is something better than nothing?  I think that when it comes to long term care insurance, in some cases, nothing is, in fact, better.

Seeking expert advice from someone knowledgeable is vital. For more information visit: www.TheLongTermCareGuy.com

5 Retirement Income Risks

Are you aware that 80% of mountain-climbing accidents happen on the way down, not the way up?  Reaching the peak is a thrill for climbers, but the second half of that journey, getting down safely, presents the greatest risk and requires the most planning.

If you have saved and invested well and reached the peak, retirement, your descent from the financial mountain is the treacherous part.  We are not alone in facing these dangers, 3.5 million of us are turning 65 every year.  Here are 5 risks we face:

1. Inflation  It is critical to maintain purchasing power.  At current levels, prices of many things will double in 20 years.  Some things will double in less time, like medical care for instance.  LTC costs have been doubling in 15 years, but with legislative hikes in minimum wage, and less workers willing to do this work, we will see costs rise faster in the future.

2. Longevity  According to the Census Bureau, the over-80 population is increasing 5 times faster than the overall population.  In just 16 years from now the populations of 32 states will resemble what Florida is like now.  Many of us will need some help with day to day activities when it becomes difficult to manage on our own.

3. Health/LTC costs  As healthcare gets more expensive, and more of it is needed as we age, it will become a huge problem.  A shortage of doctors will exacerbate the problem.  The US Health and Human Services Department states that 70% of us will need some LTC, and most people are not prepared to pay for it.

4. Market risk  If we keep our money in a “safe” place and earn less than 1%, we risk falling behind and losing money to inflation.  If we keep invested in the market and a recession occurs just as we need funds we also lose.  I leave advice on these problems to the financial planners.

5. Sequence of returns  When gains or losses occur can seriously impact your chance to outlive your money.  A significant asset loss soon after retirement may never be recovered, and with no more work income to replace lost funds, impact us much more negatively than a loss in later years.  Withdrawing money from a (suddenly) depleted account can hurt us much more than future gains can possibly correct.

If we do nothing more than watch our funds and hope for the best, ignoring the first three risks, a health or LTC need can wipe us out quickly.  Fortunately we have Medicare to help with the health care costs.  However, we have only Medicaid, a welfare program that is available only once we are completely impoverished, to help those without the ability to handle the $50,000 to $100,000 a year cost of LTC.  If you are healthy enough to consider LTC insurance, you would be well advised to do so while it is still available to you.  For more information visit www.TheLongTermCareGuy.com

Medicaid LTC Is Very Costly For States

Among people eligible for Medicaid but not Medicare, long-term care residents are most likely to be among the costliest beneficiaries for a state, according to a new report from the Government Accountability Office.

Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) requested the report, noting that much research has focused on those eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare, but has largely overlooked the Medicaid-only group. The GAO findings are meant to guide policymakers’ efforts to manage spending, the report states.

People on Medicaid for payment of LTC services compose only 4.3% of Medicaid beneficiaries nationally, but account for 31.6% of state Medicaid spending in 2009, according to the report.  Dual eligible (those eligible for Medicaid and Medicare) were an even costlier group, accounting for 35.2% of spending.

The remaining third of Medicaid dollars were spent on the 81% of Medicaid recipients who were not receiving LTC services.  As you can see, LTC is the majority of Medicaid spending, both on those who are Medicare eligible and those not yet of that age.  Fully 40% of all LTC services delivered in the USA are used by people between the ages of 18 and 64.

Some articles suggest that one should not even consider LTC insurance until you are 65 years old.  By 65, fully one-fourth of us cannot qualify to purchase LTC insurance due to our medical record.  That leaves us with little choice but to spend down our life’s savings when the need for care arises.   While many do not believe they need to leave an inheritance for family, few people want to leave a spouse or dependents with little to live on.

I occasionally encounter financial pundits who tell clients that their $200,000 or $500,000 IRA or 401K balance will take care of any LTC needs out-of-pocket, no need to buy expensive insurance that may never be needed.  I feel the same way about my car insurance (not needed in the past 25 years) or homeowners insurance (have you seen a single house burn down in your entire neighborhood in the past 30 years?).

Nest eggs are often used in retirement, that is why people saved.  How many will not touch the money, saving it in case LTC is needed?  If the money does not grow significantly, but the costs of LTC do, will there be enough?  Thirty years ago a new car averaged $12,300, gasoline was $1.11 a gallon, gold was $384 an ounce and the DOW was at 3800.

If costs of LTC services only increase at the current rate of 5%, a nursing home will cost $17,000 a month in 15 years and $34,000 a month in 30 years.  Are you prepared to handle those costs out-of-pocket when you can no longer manage on your own any more?  If the assisted living facilities or home care are only half or a third of that, how long will your funds last?

Perhaps investigating LTC insurance might be prudent.  More information is available at https://thelongtermcareguy.com

Number Of Families Providing LTC Increasing Dramatically

More than 8 million people (mostly women over 65) used the services of a LTC provider in 2012, according to the first ever compilation of federal data on the subject by the National Center for Health Statistics.  This includes adult day care, home health care providers, assisted living facilities and nursing homes.

However, the lion’s share of people receiving LTC services and support get that support from family caregivers.  Numbers are rising fast – 39% of U.S. adults care for someone with significant health issues, says the Pew Research Center, up from 30% in 2010.  That is a 30% increase in family caregiving in just 3 years.

Without family caregiving, the LTC provider system would be overwhelmed.  But what about those without family support?  Who will care for them when their health changes and they can no longer manage on their own anymore?  Many will be forced to pay for such care, but how many have prepared for this expense?

LTC insurance will not be an option for many.  By 55 years of age, 17% of Americans will be declined for such coverage.  By age 65, fully a fourth of us can no longer qualify to purchase this insurance.  These people will have no choice but to spend down their life’s savings and hope that there is enough to last – for themselves or family they leave behind.

Many do not appreciate the impact of inflation on the costs of LTC services.  Assisted living facilities often cost $50,000 a year today and nursing homes more than twice that amount.  If these costs only double every 15 years a person who is 50 today can expect to pay $400,000 per year for a nursing home at age 80 and more than a million dollars a year by 95.  And this is only accurate if inflation of LTC costs does not exceed 5%.  Minimum wages are going up legislatively, less and less workers are willing to work for these wages, and there are less workers per retired person every year worldwide.

Have you decided which family members you will ask to provide your care?  Have you contacted them to be sure they are ready and on the same page as you?  Can they afford to leave their employment to do this?  Will you be able to pay them to provide this care out of savings, or perhaps your Social Security checks?  Maybe it would be a good idea to discuss this with them – now.  For more options and ideas visit https://thelongtermcareguy.com

“Senior Tsunami” To Come

A recent California study projects “an unprecedented senior tsunami” led by 65 – 84 year old baby boomers.  This group will swell nursing home residency to more than double current levels in just over 15 years.

The findings by the UC-Berkley study paint a dire picture for California by 2030, when the state’s Medi-Cal Long Term Care (LTC) costs are expected to soar to $12.4 billion annually.  This is an 88% increase from current government spending for institutional LTC.

It does not help that rising levels of obesity are expected to exacerbate seniors’ health problems.  Obesity often leads to diabetes, and people with diabetes have a significantly higher incidence of Alzheimer’s disease.

Couple this with a recent Pew Research study that states people in the United States are much more likely to say that seniors should be responsible for their own care than people in other countries.  I find that surprising when one considers the number of people who attempt to hide assets to collect Medicaid.

Others say they plan to move in with their children, but most have not conveyed that plan to those children.  Ozzie and Harriet were a typical 50’s couple where the wife stayed home while dad went to work.  In her dress, heels and pearl necklace she had the time, space, and energy to have parents move in when they needed care.  Today most wives are working just as many hours as the husbands and have little resources to provide 24 hour care to elders.

The government itself is short on funds, you may have heard rumors of budget deficits in the news.  29 states and Puerto Rico have filial responsibility laws on the books.  These laws can force children who are above the median income of their state to be held legally responsible for parents’ bills.  They have not been enforced, until recent court case decisions  in two states.

No one knows whether these recent court cases will encourage other states to enforce their filial support laws with greater vigor, but this is a development worth watching. However, as more of the Baby Boomer generation reaches their golden years, and as many nursing homes and local governments are faced with providing care to a growing number of indigent elderly patients, there’s a possibility that other states will look more closely at their filial support statutes in an attempt to find another way to fund mom’s or dad’s nursing home bill.

There are basically three ways to pay for care if you cannot move in with your children:  pay for care until you are impoverished, apply for Medicaid when you are impoverished, or plan ahead and purchase LTC insurance while you are healthy enough to purchase it.  Insurance is the least expensive option, but if you wait until your health changes or your doctor has handed you a diagnosis of a medical condition that precludes your qualifying to purchase it, you are left with no choice but to spend down a life’s savings.  Have you even investigated this insurance?  Perhaps it’s time.

What Americans Aging Means For Long Term Care

The population of America is growing at its slowest rate ever.  Population increased last year at only 0.72%.  Yet 10,000 Americans turn 65 every day.  We are becoming an older population.

You may have read about legislation in many states to raise the minimum wage.  The great majority of Long Term Care (LTC) is done by minimum wage workers.  Every year there are less and less of them while the elder population continues to expand.  The costs of LTC services have been increasing by an average of 5% to 6% each year over the last 20 years.  The past couple of years have been a bit less than that due to the economy, but that is changing.

What happens in any industry when there are not enough workers applying for the jobs available?  Wages go up until workers apply for those jobs.  Compound that with the legislation to raise minimum wages, less and less young people willing to work for minimum wages, and the explosion of elders in America and what do you see for the future of LTC service costs?

Yesterday the PEW Research Center released a survey about aging and retirement in 21 countries.  Many countries expect to face an increase in public pension and medical expenditures costs as people age.  Public pension shortfalls are already bankrupting many U.S.  cities.  Their research showed that many countries will have more people over 65 than under 15.  In 13 of the 21 countries surveyed, respondents said the government had a key responsibility in caring for the elderly.  Does the U.S. have the money for all our elders?

The burden here is increasingly falling on family members.  Americans are quite unprepared for their later years and particularly for the potential need for LTC services and support.  When you are 85 will you depend on your 60 year old children to bathe and dress you?  Can they handle the burden of Alzheimer’s care when you must be watched every minute?  With less workers and higher minimum wages costs will soar.  Can you handle an extra bill of $40,000 to $90,000 each year in your retirement?  If costs only increase by 5%, that number will double in 15 years, and quadruple in 30.

I have a way to predict the future costs, a free online calculator that you can move the numbers around any way you want to.  It will tell you how much money you need to set aside today, so that it will grow to enough to fund your LTC in the future.  You can access it here at www.RetirementChoices.net/rraabeLTC1.html

Check it out.  Play with the numbers.  If you decide it might be worthwhile investigating LTC insurance, and you did not wait too long so that health makes it unavailable, call me.  Or call a local LTC insurance expert.  Check to be sure this is not a sideline, an also has product for them, but rather someone who is knowledgeable in this field.  Or check out my website at www.TheLongTermCareGuy.com

Medicaid Is Just Fine, Isn’t It?

If I had a nickel for every time I heard people say that Medicaid gives you the same care as paying for care does………

True, there is no sign above the door in your facility stating if you are paying the full bill for care or if Medicaid is paying the bulk of it.  However, getting in to the facility you would like to be in can be very difficult.

Medicaid does not pay the same amount to a LTC facility as you or I would if we needed to be there.  If one spends down to Medicaid impoverishment and applies for Medicaid benefits, the facility cannot ask us to leave due to the change in payment source.

They can, however, refuse to admit someone for financial reasons.  It is usually done very tactfully, the admissions person you meet with might inquire about the cares your loved one needs.  After listing those cares you might be advised that they do not currently have the staffing, equipment, etc. to provide the needed care.  Unfortunately you may need to look elsewhere.

The problem is, it is not possible to lose money on every customer, and make it up with volume.  The problem simply continues to get worse until they close their doors.  That has happened to a number of facilities, and the others have learned from this.

The Medicaid reimbursement can be from one to several thousand dollars a month less than the cost of care.  The assisted living type facilities suffer the most as the loss tends to be a larger percentage of the rates they need to charge to remain in business.  If someone has done Medicaid planning, their family now holds their assets and they are qualified for Medicaid, will they have easy entrance into the most desirable facility?  The one most people want in to, the one that might even have a waiting list?

Now consider LTC insurance as an alternative to this.  If purchased in the 40’s, 50’s, or even 60’s if still healthy enough, the premium can be easily financed with just the interest on a small portion of life savings.  Most people have some income and interest that can be contributed to the cost of care – once care is needed.  Less income may be needed for travel, boating, camping, and other fun pursuits that are no longer manageable.  Only the difference needs to come from LTC insurance meaning less insurance may be needed than most people think.

When you pay for the care you need, you have your choice of care providers.  If you are unhappy, you can easily move to a more desirable facility or provider.  You are in control and your life savings can be left to family, charity, or anyone you desire because it is not being used up.  That is how I will pay for my care, if needed.  If care is not needed, I will be in the same position I am with my auto insurance, glad that I have not had an accident (knock on wood).  For more information visit https://thelongtermcareguy.com

Minnesota Makes it Harder to Collect Medicaid For LTC

Many state have been working diligently to provide Medicaid benefits for home care instead of forcing Medicaid recipients into nursing homes.  This serves more people in nicer and often more appropriate settings.  However, it does not seem to save money as when the medicine tastes good, more people want the medicine.

Starting this month, home care benefits will only be offered by Minnesota if the recipient needs assistance with 4 activities of daily living (ADL’s).  “Until now, it has been relatively easy for poor Minnesotans to qualify for the program. It was enough to show that they needed assistance in one basic activity of daily living, such as help with bathing or dressing.”

“Under the new criteria, seniors must show that they need assistance in at least four
activities of daily living; or, alternatively, they need help in a single critical activity such as toileting or transferring, for example, moving from a bed to a wheelchair.”

Unfortunately, Medicaid home care tends to delay institutionalization, but does not prevent it, thus causing higher costs overall.  Medicaid expenditures for all LTC – home and community-based care and nursing home care combined – continue to rise rapidly everywhere.  Furthermore, the availability of home care makes Medicaid much more attractive than when nursing home care was the only option.  Thus, when home care is offered, the public is less likely to plan privately for LTC and more likely to rely on Medicaid.  Consequently, LTC expenditures, especially for home-based services, continue to skyrocket.

With Medicaid budgets increasing faster than Social Security and Medicare, the time will come when the federal government cannot print money fast enough to pay for everyone’s care under Medicaid.  Many already assume incorrectly that Medicaid is an entitlement.  One qualifies for it not by age, or disability, but by being out of money, impoverished, broke.  Nobody plans to end up that way, but with Medicaid giving out the home care people want, many incorrectly assume it is free for all.

Once care is needed, and the money is spent, it is too late to qualify to purchase LTC insurance and Medicaid is the only option.  Many Minnesotans are now learning this the hard way as their desirable benefits are now being restricted.  Compound this problem with the aging of America (10,000 Americans turn 65 every day – 12,000 turn 50 every day) and who will be left to provide the care?  America’s population is not growing, but minimum wages are.  With fewer people to fill the caregiving jobs, wages will go up until sufficient workers apply for these jobs.  Costs will rise even faster than the 5-6% average over the past 20 years in this field.  Will you be prepared?

Visit www.TheLongTermCareGuy.com to learn more.